Barristers Solicitors. Notaries Public. Legal Services. Citizenship by Investment

The Law Firm of experienced lawyers, who are networked with Specialist
Consultants and Associates in Grenada, the Caribbean and beyond.

Who we are

Are the Proposed Human Rights Constitutional Amendments Rational?

February 1, 2016


Dr. Lawrence A. Joseph

     Forty-two years ago on 7th February 1974 Grenada’s Constitution became effective. The present exercise of reviewing the Constitution therefore with a view of identifying areas which may need upgrading is long overdue. It is most significant therefore that on the 4th of December 2015 six Constitution Amendment Bills were laid in the House of Representatives for First Reading. Perhaps the most significant Bill amongst the cluster is the one entitled: Constitution of Grenada (Rights and Freedoms) (Amendment) Bill 2015. This Bill seeks to significantly improve fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals, lays down the constitutional basis for the recognition of gender equality in the state and sets out general guidelines as to how the state should be governed.

New areas of fundamental rights and freedoms which are being proposed include: equal rights for persons whether born in wedlock or out of wedlock; the right of a child up to 16 years of age to have access to publicly funded primary school education; the right of a child with a disability up to 18 years of age to have access to special education in accordance with his or her needs; the right of a person who is arrested or detained to have access to a lawyer of his or her choice without delay; the protection for intellectual property which includes works of creation of an intellectual, artistic or cultural nature (inclusive of the works of calypsonians) whether in word, in picture, in drawing or in any other form of presentation.

The Bill also proposes to widen the grounds of discrimination which are to be constitutionally prohibited to the benefit and protection of individuals within the society. In this regard, the usual discriminating  words of “race, place of origin, political opinions, colour, creed or sex” are to be deleted and the words “colour, creed, disability, ethnicity, language, place of birth, national or social origin, political opinions, race, religion, sex or social class” are to be substituted.

A most revolutionary section of the Bill relates to gender equality. The proposed constitutional amendments in this area are novel to the entire Caribbean. It is being proposed that both men and women must be  entitled to  equal rights  and status   in   all    spheres of life, especially  in   economic, educational,  political,  civic and  social activities; that both men and women must be entitled to equal access to academic, vocational and professional training, to equal opportunities in employment and promotion, to equal remuneration for work of equal value and to equal access to justice; that both men and women must have equal opportunities to be elected or appointed  to public office and to be eligible for appointment to positions of decision-making bodies at all levels of the society; and that both men and women must have the right to legal protection, including just and effective remedies, against domestic violence, sexual abuse and sexual harassment.

Gender is defined as the range of characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between male and female; and gender equality is being stated as reflecting the view that men and women should receive equal treatment and should not be discriminated against based on gender.

The Bill also proposes new and revolutionary sections which deal with establishing directive principles which seek to give general policy guidelines to the state. These policy guidelines refer to the duty of the state to protect the environment; to deal with climate change and other natural disasters; to aim at enhancing the supply of food, water and health facilities, and to exercise fiscal responsibility. The guidelines also seek to protect children generally and persons who are duly certified as being challenged physically, visually, aurally and or mentally.  It is being proposed that these persons have a   right   to   an enabling environment to develop their talents so that they may contribute to national development. Whilst these guidelines by themselves are not enforceable in a court of law, parliament may legislate to make them so.

As may be garnered from the above discussions the Bill pertaining to human rights and freedoms is far-reaching and definitely enhances the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals. The Bill seems to be most rational.  It will be most difficult to contemplate that any rational thinking person will say “NO” to this Bill on Referendum day.

DISCLAIMER: The information and materials on this page should not be taken to represent legal advice given, or legal advice received, or a substitute for legal advice, or a source of legal advice. The information is to be utilised for general informational purposes only. Instead the user should seek advice of competent legal counsel where legal advice is required.

Joseph and Joseph assume no responsibility for accuracy, currency of information provided herein or by any linked site or publication. Neither assumes any liability whatsoever for any detriment anyone may suffer as a result of reliance on any information contained in this website. Any direct or third party information published or accessed on this website shall not create an attorney client relationship with the Firm if relied upon. All publications and information contained herein, has been conceptualised and formatted by Joseph and Joseph unless otherwise stated. All rights are reserved.